The Relationship between Digital Reading Disposition and Internet-based Reading Motivation: A Study on Pre-service Teachers




Digital reading, Internet-based reading, Perceived competence, Digital reading disposition, Teacher training


This study focuses on the relationship between pre-service teachers' digital reading disposition and internet-based reading motivations, and in this context, it is aimed to examine the predictors of pre-service teachers' internet-based reading motivations on digital reading disposition. A quantitative research approach, using a relational survey design, was performed. The sample of the present study is the 401 pre-service teachers of Turkey. Correlation analysis and multiple linear regression analysis were used in the analysis of data obtained from two different scales. In the study, Digital Reading Disposition Scale and Internet Based Reading Motivation and Engagement Scale were used. Pre-service teachers’ digital reading disposition were examined and it was found that the pre-service teachers' disposition towards digital reading were moderate. Besides, it was found that pre-service teachers considered themselves to be moderately competent and dedication in reading on the internet. The findings showed that digital reading disposition could be explained by pre-service teachers' perceived competence for internet-based reading. Although pre-service teachers' perceptions of difficulty towards internet-based reading were found to be related to digital reading disposition, it was not found to be a significant predictor. In addition, there was no significant relationship between pre-service teachers' digital reading disposition and their dedication and avoidance motivation to internet-based reading. The study concludes with a discussion of the meaning of the findings for educational implications and future research.


Download data is not yet available.


Ahmadi, M. R., Ismail, H. N., & Abdullah, M. K. K. (2013). The relationship between students’ reading motivation and reading comprehension. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(18), 8-17.

Anmarkrud, Ø., & Bråten, I. (2009). Motivation for reading comprehension. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(2), 252-256.

Ata, R., & Alpaslan, M. M. (2019). Turkish adaptation of internet based reading motivation and engagement scale and an examination with pre-service teachers. Educational Technology Theory and Practice, 9(2), 522-538.

Baron, N. S. (2017). Reading in a digital age. Phi Delta Kappan, 99(2), 15–20.

Bibby, R. W., Russell, S., & Rolheiser, R. (2009). The emerging millennials: How Canada’ s newest generation is responding to change & choice. Project Canada Books.

Brandmo, C., & Braten, I. (2021). Measuring internet-specific reading motivation and engagement in an academic domain. Nordic Journal of Literacy Research, 7(1), 21-44.

Braten, I., Brandmo, C., & Kammerer, Y. (2019). A validation study of the internet-specific epistemic justification inventory with Norwegian preservice teachers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(4), 877-900.

Bruce, B. C. (1997). Critical issues literacy technologies: What stance should we take? Journal of Literacy Research, 29(2), 289-309.

Bulut, B., & Karasakaloglu, N. (2018). Digital reading disposition scale: A study of validity and reliability. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(4), 613-618.

Bulut, B., & Karasakaloğlu, N. (2019). Öğretmen adaylarının dijital okuma eğilimleri ile okuma ilgileri arasındaki ilişki. In E. Babaoğlan Çelik, E. Kıral & A. Çilek. (Eds.), Eğitim Araştırmaları [Educational Research]-2019 (pp. 136-147). Eyuder Yayınları.

Buzzetto-More, N., Guy, R., & Elobaid, M. (2007). Reading in a digital age: E-books are students ready for this learning object? Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 3, 239–250.

Carr, M., & Claxton, G. (2002). Tracking the development of learning disposition. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 9(1), 9-37.

Chen, S. F. (2017). Modeling the influences of upper-elementary school students’ digital reading literacy, socioeconomic factors, and self-regulated learning strategies. Research in Science & Technological Education, 35(3), 330–348.

Cochran, W. G. (1962). Sampling techniques. John Wiley & Sons.

Coiro, J. (2003). Exploring literacy on the internet: Reading comprehension on the internet: Expanding our understanding of reading comprehension to encompass new literacies. The Reading Teacher, 56(5), 458-464.

Coiro, J. (2011). Predicting reading comprehension on the Internet: Contributions of offline reading skills, online reading skills, and prior knowledge. Journal of Literacy Research, 43, 352-392.

Coiro, J. (2012). Understanding disposition toward reading on the internet. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 55(7), 645–648.

Coiro, J., & Dobler, E. (2007). Exploring the online reading comprehension strategies used by sixth‐grade skilled readers to search for and locate information on the Internet. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(2), 214-257.

Cuban, L., Kirkpatrick, H., & Peck, C. (2001). High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 813-834.

Dağtaş, A. (2013). On-printed page and screen reading preferences of teachers with their views on the use of electronic text in education. Turkish Studies, 8(3), 137-161.

Dobler, E., & Eagleton, M. B. (2015). Reading the web: Strategies for Internet inquiry. The Guilford Press.

Doty, D. E., Popplewell, S. R., & Byers, G. O. (2001). Interactive CD-ROM storybooks and young readers’ reading comprehension. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(4), 374–384.

Elkiran, Y. M. (2021). Examining the relationship between pre-service Turkish teachers digital writing attitudes and digital reading tendencies. International Journal of Progressive Education, 17(4), 437-450.

Farinosi, M., Lim, C., & Roll, J. (2016). Book or screen, pen or keyboard? A cross-cultural sociological analysis of writing and reading habits basing on Germany, Italy and the UK. Telematics and Informatics, 33(2), 410-421.

George, D., & Mallery, P. (2020). IBM SPSS statistics 26 step by step: A simple guide and reference (sixteenth edition). Routledge.

Graham, S., & Taylor, A. Z. (2016). Attribution theory and motivation in school. In K. R.Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 11-33). Routledge.

Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., & Perencevich, K. C. (2004). Scaffolding for motivation and engagement in reading. In J. T. Guthrie, A. Wigfield, & K. C. Perencevich, (Eds.), Motivating reading comprehension: Concept-oriented reading instruction (55-86). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Güzel, A., & Elkıran, Y. M. (2021). Türkçe öğretmeni adaylarının internet tabanlı okuma motivasyonu ve etkileşim ile mobil öğrenme tutumları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, 24, 324-341.

Hinton, P., Brownlow, C., McMurray, I., & Cozens, B. (2004). SPSS explained. Routledge.

Keskin, H. K., Baştuğ, M., & Atmaca, T. (2016). Factors directing students to academic digital reading. Education and Science, 41(188), 117-129.

Larson, L.C. (2010). Digital readers: The next chapter in e‐book reading and response. The Reading Teacher, 64(1), 15-22.

Leu, D.J., Forzani, E., Timbrell, N., & Maykel, C. (2015). Seeing the forest, not the trees: Essential technologies for literacy in the primary‐grade and upper elementary‐grade classroom. The Reading Teacher, 69(2), 139-145.

Leu, D.J., Kinzer, C.K., Coiro, J., & Cammack, D.W. (2004). Toward a theory of new literacies emerging from the Internet and other information and communication technologies. In R.B. Ruddell & N. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed.) (pp. 1570–1613). International Reading Association.

Lewis, C. (2007). New literacies. In M. Knobel, & C. Lankshear (Eds.), A new literacies sampler (pp. 229-237). Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.

Liu, Z. (2005). Reading behavior in the digital environment: Changes in reading behavior over the past ten years. Journal of Documentation, 61, 700–712.

Madden, A., Ford, N., Miller, D., & Levy, P. (2005). Using the Internet in teaching: The views of practitioners (A survey of the views of secondary school teachers in Sheffield, UK). British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 255–280.

Maden, S. (2018). Digital reading habits of pre-service Turkish language teachers. South African Journal of Education, 38(2), 1-12.

Margaryan, A., Littlejohn, A., & Vojt, G. (2011). Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies. Computers & Education, 56(2), 429-440.

Maulana, R., Helms-Lorenz, M., & van de Grift, W. (2015). A longitudinal study of induction on the acceleration of growth in teaching quality of beginning teachers through the eyes of their students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 51, 225-245.

McKenna, M.C., Kear. D.J., & Ellsworth, R.A. (1995). Children's attitudes toward reading: A national survey. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(4), 934-956.

Merga, M. K. (2015). “She knows what I like”: Student-generated best-practice statements for encouraging recreational book reading in adolescents. Australian Journal of Education, 59(1), 35–50.

Mikulecky, L., & Kirkley, J. R. (1998). Literacy instruction for the 21st-century workplace. Peabody Journal of Education, 73(3-4), 290-316.

Morgan, G. A., Leech, N. L., Gloeckner, G. W., & Barrett, K. C. (2004). SPSS for introductory statistics: Use and interpretation (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives’ digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59(3), 1065-1078.

O’Byrne, W. I., & McVerry, J. G. (2009). Measuring the disposition of online reading comprehension: A preliminary validation study. In K. M. Leander, D. W. Rowe, D. K. Dickinson, M. K. Hundley, R. T. Jimenez, & V. J. Risko (Eds.), National reading conference yearbook Vol. 58 (pp. 362-375). National Reading Conference, Inc.

Odabaş, H., Odabaş Z. Y., & Binici, K. (2019). The effects of digital information sources and media on the reading behavior of university students. Milli Eğitim, 49(227), 89-116.

Oliver, R. (2002, September). The role of ICT in higher education for the 21st century: ICT as a change agent for education. Paper presented at the International Conference on Higher Education for the 21st Century, Miri, Sarawak, Malaysia: Curtin University of Technology.

Petrini, J., Dias, R. A. P., Pertile, S. F. N., Eler, J. P., Ferraz, J. B. S., & Mourão, G. B. (2012). Degree of multicollinearity and variables involved in linear dependence in additive-dominant models. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 47(12), 1743-1750.

Popham, W. J. (2009). Assessment literacy for teachers: Faddish or fundamental? Theory into practice, 48(1), 4-11.

Putman, S. M. (2014). Exploring disposition toward online reading: Analyzing the survey of online reading attitudes and behaviors. Reading Psychology, 35(1), 1-31.

Putro, N. H. P. S., & Lee, J. (2017). Reading interest in a digital age. Reading Psychology, 38(8), 778–807.

Robinson, C., & Schumacker, R.E. (2009). Interaction effects: centering, variance inflation factor, and interpretation issues. Multiple Linear Regression Viewpoints, 35(1), 6-11.

Rose, D., & Dalton, B. (2009). Learning to Read in the Digital Age. Mind, Brain, and Education, 3(2), 74-83.

San Miguel, C. (1996). Cultural influences on academic literacy: A case study. Open Letter: Australian Journal for Adult Literacy Research and Practice, 6(2), 31–43.

Schiefele, U., Schaffner, E., Möller, J., & Wigfield, A. (2012). Dimensions of reading motivation and their relation to reading behavior and competence. Reading Research Quarterly, 47, 427-772.

Senko, C. (2016). Achievement goal theory. In K.R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 75-95). Routledge.

Singer, L. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2017). Reading on paper and digitally: What the past decades of empirical research reveal. Review of Educational Research, 87(6), 1007-1041.

Srijamdee, K., & Pholphirul, P. (2020). Does ICT familiarity always help promote educational outcomes? Empirical evidence from PISA-Thailand. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 2933-2970.

Sun, J. C. Y., Lin, C. T., & Chou, C. (2018). Applying learning analytics to explore the effects of motivation on online students' reading behavioral patterns. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(2), 209-227.

Şen, A., & Akdeniz, S. (2012). Coping with digital gap: OECD trends and Turkey. The Journal of Knowledge Economy & Knowledge Management, 7(1), 53-75.

Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (Sixth Edition). Pearson.

Tanner, M.J. (2014). Digital vs. print: Reading comprehension and the future of the book. iSchool Student Research Journal, 4(2), 6-13.

Toso, S., Atlı, Ş. M., & Mardikyan, S. (2015). Digital divide among the regions of Turkey. The Journal of Knowledge Economy & Knowledge Management, 10(1), 41-49.

Vernon, R. F. (2006). Teaching notes: Paper or pixels? An inquiry into how students adapt to online textbooks. Journal of Social Work Education, 42(2), 417-427.

Yaghi, E., T., & Abdullah, A. (2020). Understanding online reading disposition from the perspective of Saudi EFL learners. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (IJIM), 14(07), 73-87.

Yaghi, E. T., Abdullah, A., & Mustafa, Z. (2019). Investigation on motivation of online reading: A case study preparatory year students. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 18(2), 40-51.

Additional Files



How to Cite

Özkan, U. B. (2022). The Relationship between Digital Reading Disposition and Internet-based Reading Motivation: A Study on Pre-service Teachers. Psycho-Educational Research Reviews, 11(2), 172–183.